In his forty years of teaching philosophy, Kreeft says the most effective way to accomplish this purpose is to read ophy means “the love of wisdom. “The popular author and philosophy professor Peter Kreeft presents this introduction to philosophy to help beginners not only to understand philosophy but also. After teaching philosophy for forty years, Peter Kreeft finds reading the Apology of Socrates to be the most effective way to help beginners “fall in love” with.

Author: Faegore Juzragore
Country: Greece
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 19 August 2008
Pages: 372
PDF File Size: 19.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.3 Mb
ISBN: 218-7-87877-258-8
Downloads: 57754
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Moogugis

When you are sleeping in the ham- mock and a bug bite wakes you up, do you smile philoosophy the bug and say, “Thanks, I needed that”?

One can imagine the day Socrates received the god’s disturbing word from his friend Chairophon, who had just returned from pilgrimage to Delphi: How ill they know divinity in its relation, Socrates, to what is holy or unholy! How wonderfully Socrates works as a touchstone or a mirror! The first and longest chapter is charming and convincing.

Philosophy by Socrates : Peter Kreeft :

I would argue that Philosophy by Socrates is a prequel to this series and should be read before reading the rest of the kreert, but to each krreft own.

That is what it meant in Homer and Hesiod. And this is what will convict me, if anything does, not Mele- tos or Anytos but the prejudice and dislike of so many people. But this is not just a difference about the use of words. Philosophy is invulnerable And it makes the philosopher invulnerable! The explanation of Socrates’ paradox is very sim- ple, many would say even simplistic: The idea of actually meeting Socrates his ghost, at leastof seeing him as equally con- temporary to us and equally relevant and valid today as he was in Athens in b.


Because they constituted the three most socially influential and respected groups in his culture. But philossophy does not make it wise! But, Socrates, my notion is that, on this point, there is no difference of opinion among the gods— not one of them but thinks that if a person kills another wrongfully, he ought to pay for it. Truth cannot be de- stroyed, kreegt it can be hidden, by our own foolish prejudices or dark desires; and “persuasion” can lead minds to falsehood as well as to truth.

This is so whether this “god” exists or not. Rarely does Socrates claim to know something, to teach something, to give us answers. To be human is to be challenged to philosophize, and if we respond by not philosophizing, then that is our philosophy, a bad one. What is the complaint? The conclusion he is arguing for is that “it is impossible that any of us conceives it aright who think it is an evil thing to die” 4obc.

Full text of “Philosophy by Socrates: An Introduction to Philosophy via Plato’s Apology”

Philosophy is egalitarian The claim that philosophy is egalitarian phliosophy seem to contradict our previous point of Socrates’ supe- philosophu wisdom and his division of humanity into two classes: He is “brainy in skylore”, that is, an astrologer, with his phiosophy on the stars and his head in the clouds. And as un- holiness does it not always have its one essential form, which will be found in everything that is unholy?

In fact, years later, modern philosophy be- gan when Rene Descartes published the landmark Discourse on Method essentially a plea to philosophers to imitate the newly successful scientific methodwhich began, in the very first sentence, by asserting the exact opposite of the Socratic wisdom summa- rized in the last sentence of the preceding paragraph.

A philosopher loves wisdom; a “pro- fessional” loves money. That seemed to me the most shameless thing about them, unless of course they call one who speaks the truth a clever speaker. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.


Thus Socrates notes that he “was heartily disliked by many” 28a. An individual has three possible standards for liv- ing, and when any two of them conflict, one must be conformed to obeyed and the other not conformed to disobeyed.

From the Middle Ages until the latter half of the twentieth century, most liberal arts schools taught courses in rhetoric.

With regard to oreeft, I am not very eager to test their attitude to me. A popular lecturer, he has also taught at many other colleges, seminaries and educational institutions in the eastern United States.

Philosophy 101 by Socrates : An Introduction to Philosophy Via Plato’s Apology

He shows the paradox of philosophy with such terms as foolish, simplistic and conformist. Philosophy is messianic “A messiah complex” sounds as far as possible from the humility and docility we have seen associated with Socrates’ concept of philosophy. I enjoyed this book! The “Socratic” method in action, the nature of logical cross-examination, especially the search for a definition of a thing’s essence 3. I believe you held that there is one ideal form by which un- holy things are all unholy, and by which all holy things are holy.

It is a confession of humility rather than a claim of pride. After claiming he has no knowledge to teach he says, ‘ W one of you then might He is the one who knows that he does not know; God is the one who knows; and the fool is the “Sophist” who does not know that he does not know.