Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Published (Last):||10 April 2006|
|PDF File Size:||5.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island.
The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based kawus several factors: But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Archived from the original PDF on 13 September International Court of Justice. Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.
Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan. Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative. Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah.
Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.
Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi
This research is kind of research literature study.
Diplomasi Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Kasus Kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan
Text Halaman Judul 0HK The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadqn and Ligitan island which become the basic ligltan in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.
The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case. This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands.
Archived from the original on 9 April Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan island.
ran EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one. The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming pigitan Law concerning regional boundary of the State.
Divided among multiple claimants. Retrieved 7 February In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting.
More information and software credits. Government of the Philippines.
Kasua approach method use for this research is Juridical Normative. Some features of this site may not work without it. Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes. Metadata Show full item record.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method. What it is and how it Works. But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.