ISO/IEC. First edition. Software engineering — Process assessment —. Part 2: Performing an assessment. Génie logiciel — Procédés. PDF | The customization of software process capability/maturity models ( SPCMMs) to specific domains/sectors or development methodologies represents one of. Download scientific diagram | Capability dimensions of ISO/IEC from publication: The Application of International Software Engineering Standards in.
|Published (Last):||13 August 2016|
|PDF File Size:||5.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
January Learn how and when to remove this template message. The assessor validates this data to ensure it is accurate and completely covers the assessment scope. The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models.
Following this improvement programme is not mandatory and several alternative improvement programmes exist. This also enables suppliers to identify gaps between their current capability and the level required by a potential customer, and to undertake improvement to achieve the contract requirements i.
The list of processes ido grew to cover six business areas: This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Retrieved from ” https: For a successful assessment, the assessor must have a suitable level of the relevant skills and experience. ISO standards by standard number. This was expanded to oso all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. The reference model ios a process dimension and a capability dimension.
Safety extension van Loon, H.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
There exist several assessment tools. SPICE is still used for the user group of the standard, and the title 15504-22 the annual conference. An assessor can collect data on a process by various means, including interviews with persons performing the process, collecting documents and quality records, and collecting statistical process data. There are five general and industry models in use. The first versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. The organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering.
Assessors write down the assessment results and notes supporting the assessment judgment. Each process attribute consists of one or more generic practices, which are further elaborated into practice indicators to aid assessment performance.
Proposing an ISO/IEC 15504-2 Compliant Method for Process Capability/Maturity Models Customization
One of the 115504-2 is to use a conformant assessment method for the assessment process. The capability of processes is measured using process attributes. The 7th part is currently in an advanced Final Draft Standard form  and work has started on part 8. Articles needing cleanup from January All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from January Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from January Articles with obsolete information from October All Wikipedia articles in need 15540-2 updating All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May Work on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.
The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts.
The simplest comprise paper-based tools. With new parts being published, the process categories will expand, particularly for IT service process categories and enterprise process categories.
This has been for several reasons:. The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual assessment. This is an elaboration of the oso reference model PRM provided by the process lifecycle standards.
The initial International Standard was recreated in 5 parts. Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor. List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards. The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step.
This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at This page was last edited on 12 Juneat Process rating requires some exercising of expert judgment on the part of the assessor and this is the reason that there are requirements on assessor qualifications and competency.
It specifies requirements for improvement programmes and provides guidance on planning and executing improvements, including a isl of an eight step improvement programme.
Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made. The international standard defines nine process attributes:. Views Read Edit View history. In general, they are laid out to incorporate the assessment model indicators, including the base iwo indicators and generic practice indicators.
Data modeling Enterprise architecture Functional specification Modeling language Orthogonality Programming paradigm Software Software archaeology Software architecture Software configuration management Software development methodology Software development process Software quality Software quality assurance Software verification and validation Structured analysis.
Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods. The specific problem is: The actual method is not specified in the standard although the standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method. 1504-2 are a limited number of computer based tools that present 15504-22 indicators and allow users to enter the assessment judgment and notes in formatted screens, as well as automate the collated assessment result i.
The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the persons assessed to ensure that they agree that the iiso is accurate.